How could the Department of justice confirm in writing to a member of the media that the issue in relation to Evan Fitzgerald's tragic case was referred to Fiosrú on 10 May and the Minister could not comment because of that, yet at the justice committee yesterday the Commissioner said he referred it on 18 to 19 May? How could the Department of justice and the Minister say it was referred more than a week before it was referred? How could they say it was referred a week before the Commissioner actually referred it? How, on 4 March, in the original court case which is now over for this gentleman, a Cheann Comhairle-----

Sentiment score: 0.36

I am referring to this poor, tragic, vulnerable individual who passed away. How is it that reports from The Irish Times and other media-----

Sentiment score: -0.41

-----stated that when Judge Zaidan-----

Sentiment score: 0.00

-----asked what the providence of the guns was, the Garda said, "investigations are ongoing" into who sold the guns?

Sentiment score: 0.00

Investigations are ongoing and we now know the guns were actually given to him by An Garda Síochána. How could An Garda Síochána say in court-----

Sentiment score: 0.00

-----it did not know where the guns came from if we now know they came from An Garda Síochána itself?

Sentiment score: 0.00

Agreed.

Sentiment score: 0.27

The week before-----

Sentiment score: 0.00