I move: That Dáil Éireann: recognises that: — Ireland is the most exposed country in the European Union (EU) to a United States (US) tariffs war, and while a reprieve has been given to the pharma sector, the landing zone on tariffs is still not known; — a full-scale tariff war will affect Ireland disproportionately, and while Ireland exported €223.8 billion of goods and services last year, one third of these exports, €72 billion, went to the US, of which €58 billion of this is made up of pharmaceuticals and chemicals; — Ireland is a small open economy, and a fall in international trade, precipitated by the increase in global tariffs, will hit Ireland hard; — Ireland is potentially facing a fall in employment and job creation, leaving many indigenous businesses, especially in the agri-food sector and drinks sector, badly hit; — corporation taxes are likely to fall, and future public spending is in real danger; and — the all-Ireland economy and the Windsor Framework will face significant challenges with differing tariff regulations on each side of the border, and products with integrated North–South supply chains will face major difficulties; acknowledges that: — Ireland's economy is unbalanced, and Ireland is heavily reliant on the foreign direct investment (FDI) sector and has a small, weak indigenous enterprise sector; — Ireland has become a very expensive location to do business and has the most expensive net electricity prices in the EU; — Irish firms seeking to grow are often located outside of Ireland; and — Ireland has capacity shortages in many key infrastructure areas, from housing to transport to energy; and calls on the Government to: — take a stronger and more direct role in negotiating with the US administration, as the stated objective of the US administration is to reduce the perceived trade imbalance between the US and the EU, and seek if this can be addressed while protecting the Irish economy; — demand that the EU pursues a pragmatic policy of de-escalation; — ensure that the EU does not make retaliatory tariff decisions that makes a target for the US of key Irish enterprise sectors; — significantly increase Ireland's diplomatic footprint in Washington DC, with the Republican Party in the US, and in the office of Permanent Representation of Ireland to the EU; — develop Covid-19/Brexit magnitude supports for indigenous enterprise sectors that will be worst hit, providing export and market diversification supports, and provide increased grant funding for increased research, development and innovation; — create sectoral taskforces to include relevant stakeholders, including employers and trade unions, and provide adequate income supports to workers who lose their jobs; — continue to attract and support FDI, but also start to develop a stronger indigenous enterprise sector which is less mobile and less likely to move out of Ireland; — reduce the reliance of corporation tax in Ireland's enterprise policy by investing in other competitive advantages, such as transport, housing, communications, energy, water and education infrastructure; — reduce input costs to businesses, such as electricity, property, banking, insurance, and other utility costs; — review non-human resource regulation on indigenous enterprise, with a view to cutting unnecessary red tape and bureaucracy, which will simplify and speed up the planning process, and improve investment opportunities for growing Irish firms; — create a better regional and spatial delivery of Enterprise Ireland and IDA Ireland investments; and — reinstate the Oireachtas Joint Committees on Enterprise, Trade and Employment and on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform, and Taoiseach immediately. I am proud to move the first Aontú Private Members' motion in the Dáil this morning. We have decided to use our time as best we can in an effort to make sure we fight for Irish jobs, which are in significant difficulty, fight for the standard of living for families and fight for the economic health of our country. All of these issues are in grave danger today. I believe this is a dark day for world history. It is definitely a dark day for the Irish economy and it has been a shock to many people as to how little time the political establishment has spend on this particular issue since the election. It looks like this particular issue has been eclipsed, in many ways, by the chaos in the Dáil over the last number of months. Trump's global tariffs come into effect today in many parts of the world and the size and breadth of those tariffs are eye-watering. Absolutely nobody in this Chamber would have believed we would be looking at the size of the tariffs being implemented today. The idea that a 104% tariff is being placed on goods from China into the US is absolutely startling. It completely eviscerates the world economic order for the last 30 or 40 years. The EU is now facing 25% tariffs on cars, steel and aluminium, and the so-called reciprocal tariffs on all other EU goods of 20%. This creates an enormous challenge for so many Irish businesses. Maroš Šefčovič has threatened to create an EU anti-coercion instrument, the ACI, which could have an enormous affect on US businesses, their services to the EU and their access to public procurement tenders in the future. In fairness to him, the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade, Deputy Harris, rightly stated this would be the nuclear option in terms of the tariffs imposed on the world. Ireland is the most exposed country in the European Union to the United States's tariffs. We have seen a reprieve for pharma so far, but the pharmaceutical sector was targeted again in the rhetoric of Donald Trump last night, which means it is very likely to be hit by a significant tariff in the near future. A full scale tariff war would affect Ireland disproportionately. Ireland exported €223 billion of goods last year and a third of these exports, €72 billion, went to the United States of America, of which €58 billion were made up of pharmaceuticals and chemicals. This is an enormous exposure. It is interesting if you compare and contrast our exports to the rest of the EU. We exported €81 billion worth of goods to the EU in 2023. The EU is our biggest trading partner but it is not that far off where our trade with the United States is. There is only 12% of a difference. The Irish economy, as it is currently structured, is significantly integrated into the US economy. Ireland is in real danger and in serious trouble if this escalates. Escalation is the enemy of the Irish economy in the trade war with the United States. We are not only exposed to the US. We are, by our nature, a small, open economy. Anybody who studied economics for the leaving certificate or in university will have learned all about the fact we are very exposed to international trade as well. This increase in global tariffs will affect international trade in a significant fashion. It is estimated that there is a 60% chance of a global recession and this will hurt Ireland hard. There is no doubt in my mind that we are exposed significantly because of the economy that has been build by generations of Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael governments. The indigenous sector has been the poor relation of enterprise development over the last number of decades and, as a result, we have a massive exposure to FDI. I want to say very clearly that FDI is good, FDI has a significant positive effect in this country and FDI should be nurtured but our dependency on the FDI sector has put us in this over-exposure situation at the moment. We have another difficult aspect to consider here and that is the all-Ireland economy. As there are now two different tariffs in both parts of Ireland, that means we have an added complexity. In recent years, we have tried to navigate through the Windsor Framework to make sure the all-Ireland economy can function but now we will have a situation where whiskey from Cork has one tariff while whiskey from Antrim has another tariff. There are many enterprises along the Border that have integrated supply chains, which really makes it very difficult to understand how these companies will be dealt with in terms of these tariffs. The economic vista facing this country is significantly poorer. Unless there is a resolution of this, we could be a looking at a situation not too dissimilar from the economic crash in 2008. We could be looking at situations where we are talking about reduced taxation receipts, reduced public expenditure and the word "austerity" word could be used in the next two or three years. This is how deadly serious the situation we are in at the moment is. I mentioned FDI and so on but one of the things we have to do is use this situation as an opportunity to reset the Irish economy to a certain extent. I said that FDI was good but FDI is normally used as a transitional economic policy by developing countries. Typically, a developing country would use the FDI to bring in capital and expertise to be able to grow its economy so it can then develop a strong indigenous enterprise. That has not happened. That second element of government policy has never really happened in this country. As a result, Ireland is very much exposed to the movement of FDI. Indigenous enterprise is stickier, less mobile and less likely to leave this country if the prevailing wind changes. Foreign direct investors are far more likely to leave. One of the other threats to this country concerns corporation taxes. Again, the Government has really focused on a very small basket of competitive advantages, and that basket contains, primarily, low corporation taxes. It is true that Ireland’s membership of the EU attracts FDI, that Ireland’s being an English-speaking country is useful to US firms and that Ireland has had a well-educated workforce, but the primary tool Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael have used to attract FDI has been the provision of bargain-basement corporation taxes over the years. Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael have made this country a tax haven. In fact, Ireland is considered by the Tax Justice Network to have leapfrogged the Bahamas to become the ninth most significant tax haven, according to its ranking. That makes us a target of the US because Trump sees our corporation tax rate as a threat to his economic model. Let me show how precarious the situation with corporation taxes is. Ten CFOs are responsible for 40% of the corporation tax paid in Ireland. That is an incredible figure. Considering that corporation tax now represents 27% of the Irish net tax intake and is the second biggest head in tax receipts, and that ten individuals determine 40% of the corporation tax paid, it is startling that we would have such a narrow tax base. We are here all the time listening to the Government on the need to broaden the tax base, yet the reality is that it has become narrower and we have become significantly dependent in our budgetary expenditure on that narrow tax base. That shows how under threat our expenditure will be if we lose the significant elements of the corporation taxes. For sure, manufacturing companies will not leave overnight, but much of the corporation tax is paid on intellectual property and already we are seeing a reduction in intellectual property in Ireland. Ireland has an incredibly unbalanced economy, so we really need to develop our indigenous sector. We need to build a strong one that is able to compete internationally so we do not have the weakness in the future. How do you build a strong indigenous sector? One of the first things you do is make Ireland a good place to do business. Right now, Ireland is extremely expensive. Irish electricity prices are the highest in Europe and that is hurting foreign direct investors and indigenous businesses alike. Ireland has endless capacity shortages. We have shortages in key infrastructure, from housing and energy to transportation, and these represent competitive disadvantages in business. Most businesses will tell you they want a number of things. They want low-cost inputs, to be able to transport their products with ease in and out of the market, to be able to communicate properly with the rest of the world, to be able to ensure red tape and bureaucracy do not hamper their development, a good investment environment within the economy, and well-educated people. If most businesses have these, they will be happy to do business in a location. However, we do not have them. The main frustration for so many people has been the incompetence of the Irish Government in making sure the infrastructure in this regard is built. What we are looking for in this motion is simply for Ireland to take a far stronger negotiation stance with the US Administration. Aontú and I believe Ireland could be a bridge between the US and the EU in terms of the negotiation. We also need to understand what the US wants. The US has a perception that there is a significant trade imbalance with the EU. We have to address that perception to be able to properly negotiate with the US. We also need the EU to be pragmatic and de-escalate. An escalation would be massively damaging to this country. The EU cannot out-bravado Donald Trump. Donald Trump is unencumbered by common sense, political pressure and international convention, so the idea that we can somehow out-bravado him on this, given that he has launched a 104% tariff on China, is absolutely wrong. I actually believe the best retaliation is no retaliation until we properly negotiate what the EU does. We also need to ensure the EU does not make targets of Irish sectors for retaliatory tariffs. There was a danger regarding bourbon and Irish whiskey, and I am thankful for the efforts the Government has made to knock bourbon off the retaliation target list from the EU perspective. We need to significantly increase Ireland’s diplomatic footprint in Washington DC and the Republican political party. Most of Ireland’s influence over recent years has been on the Democrats. It has been weaker in respect of the Republican Party, and we in Aontú are reaching out to that party at the moment. We also need to increase the staffing of the Permanent Representation of Ireland to the European Union, which is not at the level that is necessary at present. We need to develop what I would say are Covid- or Brexit-magnitude supports for indigenous businesses to ensure they are ready in those sectors most hit in terms of exports. We need to provide export-diversification supports and ensure relevant firms have the ability to hold on to staff if they go through a period in which income has collapsed. We need to create a sectoral task force where relevant stakeholders, including employers and trade unions, can start to steer its direction. Those stakeholders would have far more knowledge about their own sectors than most people in this House. We need to continue to attract FDI but we really need to develop stronger indigenous enterprise, which is less mobile and less likely to leave the country. We need to reduce our reliance on corporation taxes by properly investing in other competitive advantages, such as those associated with transport, housing, communications, energy, water and education infrastructure. I am aware that the Government is going to state it has changed the corporation tax system and accepted the OECD’s best formula on corporation tax; however, truth told, the Government was pulled in that direction kicking and screaming. At meetings of the finance committee, I sat in front of Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael Ministers who were absolutely against the idea of changing and regularising our corporation taxes to make them more internationally fair. Corporation taxes are very important.
Sentiment score: 0.11
The Minister of State is corrupting what I have said.
Sentiment score: 0.00
I said that FDI was good and I welcome it.
Sentiment score: 0.71
That is what I said.
Sentiment score: 0.00
The Minister of State's peak argument is not what I said.
Sentiment score: -0.36
With unfair regulations.
Sentiment score: -0.48
We are criticising the Government's policies and not the outcomes.
Sentiment score: -0.40
It is incredible.
Sentiment score: 0.00
No, we are not. We referred to it in terms of transitional policy. The Minister of State has got to tell the truth.
Sentiment score: 0.01
We have the sums.
Sentiment score: 0.00
No wonder people do not believe you.
Sentiment score: -0.30
There is a weakness in your argument when you have to tell untruths.
Sentiment score: -0.65
I will say it slowly in my closing speech so you will understand it better.
Sentiment score: 0.44
We are not-----
Sentiment score: 0.00
FDI is good and it should be attracted and nurtured. The Government is trying to critique Aontú's criticism of its policy and twist it in a fashion to say that we are in someway criticising FDI.
Sentiment score: 0.07
We are not; we are criticising the Government's overexposure to FDI-----
Sentiment score: 0.31
-----and its inability to create a balanced economy-----
Sentiment score: -0.15
-----in which it makes sure indigenous enterprise is also thriving. That is a big problem. The Government has massively exposed Ireland by not developing indigenous enterprise in recent years. It has created a weakness in the Irish sector. I will give an example if the Minister of State and the Minister will stop shaking their heads for two seconds. Ten CFOs control 40% of the corporation tax coming into this country.
Sentiment score: -0.13
Ten individuals control 40% of the corporation tax coming into this country. Corporation tax is the second biggest tax in the State. It makes up 27% of the tax receipts. That is a massive exposure. It is a very narrow tax base. It means that if decisions are made by those ten individuals, it creates a big hole in our budget.
Sentiment score: 0.05
That is the first thing. The second issue is that we obviously need to develop FDI but we also need to develop indigenous enterprise and the way to do that is to make sure first of all that input costs are low. Input costs in this country are massively high. They are threatening indigenous and FDI business at a big rate. The other issue is that there are, or should be, other competitive advantages in this country, such as transport, housing, communications and education, but the Government has been incompetent in its delivery in all those areas over the past two decades. That has weakened our suite of competitive advantages and narrowed our emphasis on the corporation tax element, which again has put us in the sights of the US. We need to do more. Another element of this motion is to ask the Government to do more in terms of negotiating with the US and strengthening our case. Other than today's meeting with Lutnik and a couple of conversations that Ministers have had with Republican parliamentarians in the United States, there is very little evidence of real diplomatic efforts to make Ireland's case to the US Administration in the matter the Government should. That is not unusual because this Government outsources most things to the EU in many ways. The difficulty is that although the EU was good for Ireland in the Brexit negotiations, it was poor for Ireland in the context of the financial crash 15 years ago. It made decisions on the basis of the needs of Germany, France and Italy and not on the needs of the Irish people. The Irish people have paid 47% of the cost of that economic crash even though we were 1% of it. Another example is the Mercosur deal. The Mercosur deal is an international trade deal based on the needs of German car manufacturers and not on the basis of those of Irish farmers. When there are competitive interests within the EU, we often do not get the right shakedown with regard to needs. That is why it is really important that we do the necessary negotiations with the US. The reality is Ireland could actually be a bridge between the US and the EU in this particular crisis. The other issue I wish to raise is that it is incredible that this is the first time the crisis around the tariffs has been put on the Dáil agenda. With this crisis looming, probably one of the biggest existential crises threatening this country and our economy, it took Aontú to be the first to put in on the Dáil agenda. It is so frustrating that we are here on the day these tariffs have been implemented and we still do not have a finance committee or a public expenditure committee or a Good Friday Agreement committee to deal with the North-South elements of this. The political establishment has spent more time in dysfunction in the past few weeks than in preparing for this particular crisis. What we are doing now is urging this Government to take a stronger role in negotiating with the United States and with the EU. We are asking the Government to make sure there is a policy of de-escalation within the EU. We propose that the best retaliation would be no retaliation for the moment for the Irish economy because a retaliation from the European side will also put Ireland in major difficulty. We are asking the Government to get real and make sure there is an urgency on this issue. Thousands of Irish jobs and the incomes of so many people are under threat. The Government needs to get active now.
Sentiment score: -0.05