I am loath to interrupt, but I believe relevance might be an issue with regard to the Estimates debate.

Sentiment score: -0.18

Okay.

Sentiment score: 0.23

I do not wish to interrupt, but I point to relevance. This is a debate about funding and the Estimates. The matter the Deputy is discussing should be brought to GSOC as opposed to the Minister at this point. I ask her to stick to the topic of Estimates and funding.

Sentiment score: -0.00

Yes, but there needs to be relevance to that funding and to the Estimates. To be fair, what you are discussing relates more to making complaints to GSOC.

Sentiment score: 0.02

If that is happening, then I ask the Deputy to stick to the debate. I do not believe it has relevance.

Sentiment score: 0.00

Thank you, Deputy.

Sentiment score: 0.36

I have reprimanded the Deputy's colleague Deputy Farrell on relevance. This is a debate about the Revised Estimates. If the Deputy is saying something about the Estimates and money, which are what the debate is actually about-----

Sentiment score: 0.00

He should please stick-----

Sentiment score: 0.32

The Deputy should preface his remarks with a reference to funding, because I am not hearing that his remarks are about the Revised Estimates.

Sentiment score: 0.00

And funding.

Sentiment score: 0.00

The context of funding.

Sentiment score: 0.00